« Auditions 19: Danny B. & Nick Rider | Main | Jonathan Vargas at Paradise Club in New Jersey! »
August 06, 2007
NY Blade column: Burn the Koran? It’s Gay Artwork
By MICHAEL LUCAS
Aug. 03, 2007
http://nyblade.com/2007/8-3/viewpoint/opinion/koran.cfm
Gay artist Charles Merrill, peace be upon him, is a most intriguing figure, socially engagé in the fine tradition of Albert Camus. He says: “The role of the artist is to fix unjust laws in the fabric of society that need to be fixed.”
Back in the summer of 2006, a Muslim member of the Israeli Knesset, Ibrahim Sarsur, of the United Arab List party, warned gays that “if they dare to approach the Temple Mount during the World Pride 2006 parade in Jerusalem they will do so over our dead bodies.” In response, Charles Merrill, at the time 72, said: “I will be approaching the Temple Mount out of love and forgiveness to those who hate us. If the three major religions in the Middle East want us stoned to death as it dictates in their ancient scriptures, then our gentle innocent blood will be on their hands. Gays are the meek in society and love all of humanity.”
More recently, Merrill took ink and scissors to a copy of a Bible, editing out the anti-gay passages. He followed that up by burning a rare copy of the Koran with a reported value of $60,000 that had been given to his late wife by the King of Jordan. You can hardly find a reference to Jordan that doesn’t claim it is a “moderate Muslim” country. Funny, though, that you don’t just as often get a reminder that no Jew may be a citizen of Jordan, or buy land there. There are elements in Jordanian society that regularly assert the notion that all homosexuality in the Middle East is Israel’s “fault.”
Merrill edited the Bible in the open, but he burned the Koran at “an undisclosed location in Chicago.” What does that tell us about the reactions to be expected of Muslims as opposed to those of non-Muslims on such occasions?
GAY BLOGS HAVE been abuzz with commentary on Charles Merrill’s gay-positive artistic statements. Some of those comments irk me, especially those that suggest respect is automatically due religious texts and traditions. Just what about anti-gay religious texts should be respected? The Bible is dead wrong to call homosexuality an abomination, and the Koran and the Hadith are even more dead wrong to call for human beings who engage in same-sex intimacies to be killed.
As Americans, we shouldn’t suffer any naïveté regarding the thoughts of the Muslims within our borders. The recent Pew Research study with the misleading title “Muslim Americans; Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream” found that only 40 percent of those American Muslims surveyed believe that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by Arabs. Furthermore, 69 percent of all American Muslims said that society should discourage homosexuality, and 59 percent believe that government should do more to “protect morality in society.”
There’s a very important point to be made here. Islam by its nature as defined in the Koran is a religion that demands to be an integral part of human political organization. People following what the Koran says believe that the laws of a land and indeed the world should be Islamic laws, the original Islamic laws as dictated by Mohammed. If they don’t believe that, they aren’t following the Koran. Muslims are engaged in a struggle—a jihad, sometimes violent, sometimes political—to bring about a worldwide Islamic system. Never mind that they will enthusiastically slaughter each other in the fight over whether that system should be Sunni or Shia. Non-Islamic countries, by contrast, do not base their laws on religious texts. They are, rather, pluralistic, and tolerate people of all religions, with the understanding that all must follow the society’s civil laws.
ANOTHER ARGUMENT I see some gay people advancing in blog comments is that of moral relativity. According to the illogic of that position, because Christian and Jewish religious texts call homosexuality an “abomination,” those two religions are as bad toward gays as Islam.
I recommend anybody stupid enough to believe that to buy an airplane ticket to Iran. They can save themselves the need for and the expense of buying a round-trip ticket by standing in downtown Teheran, kissing another gay man. The Koran is choc-a-bloc with absurdist and often vicious fairy tales; but what’s happening to gay people today in Iran is literally bloody murder—it’s real, and it’s inspired directly by the Muslim murderers’ devotion to Islamic religious texts.
Look, Charles Merrill burned the Koran specifically to protest the horrendous anti-gay crimes of Muslims. Some gay people commenting on blogs get it. But enough don’t for me to find their attitudes extremely disturbing.
Between the Koran and the Hadith there is no question but that Mohammed, fatuously and ridiculously claiming to be speaking the thoughts and words of a Supreme Nincompoop called “Allah,” believed that two men caught having sex with each other should be put to death. The Koran and the Hadith continue in our day to inspire Muslims to murder gay people. So in the name of reason, how could any gay person criticize Charles Merrill for burning a Koran in protest of that?
The Koran is today’s “Mein Kampf.” By the way, “Kampf” and “jihad” are, respectively, the German and Arabic words for “struggle.” If enough Germans had burned Hitler’s book before the Nazis overpowered Germany, perhaps the Germans wouldn’t have wound up having to rebuild their entire country over the ashes of countless millions of dead.
So I salute Charles Merrill for his artistic and social bravery in burning a Koran. I encourage you to show your support for him by attending his exhibit “Gay Activism Into Art Form,” which will be shown August 16–31 at the Broadway Gallery.
Posted by Michael at August 6, 2007 05:26 PM
Comments
It has come to light that Chauncey Bailey, the black editor of an Oakland, California newspaper shot in cold blood one morning last week was a targeted victim of a Black Muslim Group.
He had written a truthful report about "Your Black Muslim Bakery," a local business, and the Muslims chose to assasinate him. We are already in the Holland of van Gogh murdered for making a film about Muslim abuse of women.
Fuller details of the case are available online. You have to search outside of major newspapers and magazines, however, to find any honest and open reporting about the Muslims who planned and committed this murder, and that part of their Islamic religion that inspired them to do it.
This is an outrageous, landmark crime. It is, apparently, the first time a journalist has been killed in the US by people (monsters?) affiliated with a religious group. The message of this murder is clear; do not report anything negative about Muslims, or you will be murdered too.
Anybody with a brain will have noticed already that mainstream US papers and magazines do not print anything critical of Islam itself. They may say something negative about individual Muslim criminals, but not about the Islamic philosophy that inspired them to commit their crimes.
In other words, in today's United States, freedom of speech with regards to Islam has been severely curtailed. That isn't something that might happen in the future, it is something that has already happened. And because it has happened, Muslims are freer than they otherwise would have been to plot and carry out their nefarious schemes.
A leader of courage and conviction would stand up at this time and say that the US will not be cowed by any Muslim, including Muslims native to this country. A leader of courage and conviction would state those parts of Islamic teachings that are not compatible with civilization and decency towards others. But we have Bush, who invited Muslims to the White House to celebrate the end of Ramadan, refers to Islam as a "great religion" though its texts call for gay people to be murdered, and is about to permit the sale of heaps of advanced weaponry to our dear dear friends in Saudi Arabia. How is Bush going to sell them those arms but not say anything about the oppression of gay people there? This man doesn't give a fuck about personal liberties, democracy, or any other pretty things like that. He will tell any lie and commit any crime against the American people in order to make his bank account and those of his family increase. Don't believe a word you hear of why it is "strategically" desirable to sell those arms to the Saudis. Bush and Cheney want to sell those weapons to them because they will personally profit from the sale. The Saudi government is precarious before an angry populace made up of people who think exactly as did the 9/11 attackers. DUH!!!! Is it a good idea to send advanced arms systems to that country?
Our government and media are cowardly in the fight against Islamic encroachment here, and are aiding and abetting it in other parts of the world.
What a fuck of a thing.
Posted by: Tight Hole at August 7, 2007 07:54 PM
michel...u have inspired me with your blog...u have opened my eyes to many things i had never thought of...heeh...yer much more than just a prety face and hot ass...lol...looking fwd to much more...btw...i'm an avid derek and romaine listener...but unfortunately have missed every time u have been on....and since january this year,,,,i haven't missed much...REALLY sorry that the4 few days i did miss were when u were there...
thnx...and with DNR...i go by Trucker_Kevin
later dude
kevin
Posted by: cramdin1 at August 8, 2007 01:16 AM
