« CHAD HUNT MAKES DIRECTORIAL DEBUT IN AUDITIONS 9: CHAD HUNT! Order NOW. | Main | Michael's Mailbox: You Gave Liberals A Bad Name »
April 28, 2006
The Danger We Are All Facing
There is at present a debate in Germany and throughout Europe over whether to exclude Iran from the World Cup of Soccer, to be held this summer in Germany.
There should be no such debate. There is, rather, a moral imperative to exclude Iran from the games.
Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad minces no words; he is calling for the destruction of Israel. Even if it weren’t for that, people of good conscience should be calling for Iran to be excluded from the World Cup because of the Islamic Republic’s ongoing severe persecution of LGBT people.
What the Nazis did to Jews and LGBT people is no secret; for German Chancellor Angela Merkel to not call for Iran to be excluded from the World Cup held on her territory is a deeply shameful disgrace to her. The ghosts of the 6 million murdered are pointing their fingers at her accusingly, and we should be too.
As regards Ahmadinejad’s call for the destruction of Israel; Westerners inclined to support the so-called Palestinians should be asking themselves the role of that group of Arabs within the larger world Islamist community.
One major widespread falsehood being exploited by Ahmadinejad is the allegation that Jews only arrived in Israel after the Holocaust. But the verified historical record shows that Jews were in Israel several thousand years before any Arab person set foot on the territory. Indeed, Arabs invaded the area out of the Eastern Roman Empire in the 600s, and when they did so, they did not at all talk about being Palestinians. In truth, it is a matter of record that throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the area that is now Israel, the West Bank and Gaza functioned as southern extensions of Syria and Jordan (with Jews present in the territory) and there was not a peep out of any Arab or other person about the necessity for a “Palestinian” country.
What is the Palestinian identity, anyway? Name three great Palestinian writers of the nineteenth century. Name three significant Palestinian artists of the nineteenth century. Name three important, or for that matter, unimportant Palestinian social leaders, scientists or soap salesman of the nineteenth century. What are their names? What did they do? Where did they do it? What made them Palestinian?
The Palestinian identity was manufactured by the Arabs in reaction to the move by Jewish people to re-establish the country their forefathers had founded in ancient times. When the modern country of Israel was founded, the non-Jews, including the Arabs living in its territory were invited to be part of Israeli democracy and in fact still take part in that democracy. By contrast, all Jews were expelled by force from Arab lands, though their families had been living in them for centuries and in many cases millennia.
Westerners inclined to support the so-called Palestinians should wake up right now to the truth about Islamist world goals. The Islamists mean to establish a world theocracy in which no departures from fundamentalist religious law are tolerated. Hamas, currently heading the so-called Palestinians, clearly expresses its desire to establish an Islamic state, and it does so with the full support of Iran, which shares with it the desire to establish an Islamic theocracy worldwide.
Wake up already people! As traumatic as the 9/11 attacks were for us, we must remember that they were planned to be yet more devastating. The Islamists’ intent on that day was to destroy the U.S. Capitol building and the White House. They were not aiming to do that because they thought it would be an expedient means for establishing a Palestinian state, after which time they would live in peace and harmony with all in the world. They were aiming to strike the U.S. Capitol and the White House because their goal is to establish an Islamic theocracy worldwide.
Because the stakes are so high, the West has a responsibility to itself to exclude Iran from the World Cup. It is folly to posit that sports have nothing to do with politics. Indeed, there are precedents for banning teams from the World Cup; for example, in 1992, the former Yugoslavia was kept out of the European Cup in Sweden, while in 1994 the ex Yugoslavia was barred from World Cup qualification matches by FIFA, the soccer organization that now says it does not get involved in politics. Soccer is very important to the Iranians. By excluding them from the World Cup, and by making it very clear to them why they are being excluded, pressure can be brought upon them to agitate for a more reasonable position from their government.
Posted by Heather at April 28, 2006 03:24 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.lucasblog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/279
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Danger We Are All Facing:
» Buy adderall no prescription. from Buy adderall.
Adderall xr. Adderall prescription. Lower back pain and adderall. [Read More]
Tracked on October 9, 2008 07:34 AM
» Evista. from Evista problems.
Evista. [Read More]
Tracked on October 30, 2008 06:36 PM
» Chemical compounds of xanax. from Xanax.
Xanax. [Read More]
Tracked on November 9, 2008 12:09 AM
Comments
Right on Michael.
Your grasp of historical fact is awsome. Merkel should join with other European nations to ban Iran. That person who is Iran's dictator, along with the Ayatollah (assahola) are crazy. Maybe if they ban the Iranians from soccer, the people may begin to work to overthrow the religious crazies. (& while we are at it, why don't we begin to overthrow our homegrown crazies here?)
Posted by: Russ at April 28, 2006 05:04 PM
Your personal comments make some sense but dont get so arrogant by infering that Palestinians are somehow worthless since they did not produce the finest artists (in your opinion). Your skew of world history is somewhat biassed so I wont waste time since we will not get anywhere so I will only address the Iranian issue. As you lived in the Soviet Union in 1980, the world pondered the same situation as the Soviet Union was hosting the winter olympics. Since you were behind the Iron Curtain and was not aware of every position in the world, let me remind you. The USSR was committing atrocities in Aghganistan with the invasion. Soviet troops used mustard gas in some towns. In any event, the USA was boycotting the Olympics. However, some opinions (world governments and USA athletes) spoke that politics should not be mixed with sports. For example, the USA could play Iran (the 2 biggest enemies) in the World Cup. Most Arab countries state that they will not compete against Israeli athletes in the Olympics. In my opinion, those countries should be banned from the Olympics. That should be the one time when humanity can show those idiotic governments that they can respect eachother. Sporting events should not be mixed with politics. However, it is sick to think the world traveled to Nazi Germany to compete in Olympic games. I am totally against the Iranian government, but am smart enough to know this rambling from their goverment is to create a nationalistic wave of support. So, you ask a good question but I am not sure I agree 100% with your opinion. Of course Israel has a right to exist and Jews roamed Israel for many years before Palestine. However, it is wise to be objective that the atrocities of those damn Nazis created this middle east crisis we have today. The destruction of Israel should never happen, but the Palestinians are human too and got royally screwed no doubt. Imagine today if Spain came back to claim Florida and kicked the Americans out. I know you are smarter than what you write. You have an objectivity for gay porn and I have faith that objetivity will come through on world history too :)
Posted by: Luke at April 28, 2006 11:02 PM
I disagree with you luke!
sorry but lucas's point of view is my point of view to!and
it has nothing to do with the fact i am french!
Posted by: DAVID at April 30, 2006 06:53 PM
Michael -
Once again bravely & well said. Iran is simply the biggest threat to global balance today and unfortunately some non-political atheletes should be forced to stay home during the world cup. That's just the way it works, there is no realistic scenario where the citienzry does not pay for the actions of thier leaders, whether they agree with them or not.
And as for the Palestinians, when was the last time we saw a major university or cultural center built with the billions in aid sent to them by the international community? When was the last time they used thier collective energies to support another country during a time of crisis (i.e. earthquakes & tsunamis)?
As for Israel, they have the right to exist, just like any other ethnic group. Luke, it was the actions of Nazi Germany that perhaps did put in place the consensus of the UN to declare the Nation of Israel, both physcally and socially - but that was a responsible action accelerated by genocidal policies. And as for peace, Israel has given up miles of land taken in wars after they were attacked. The Spanish/Florida example cited is not even a close analogy, sorry Luke.
Yassar Arafat's family is soaking in the spoils of International Aid programs in swollen Swiss bank accounts while thier people don't even have basic medical care. In my opinion, the Arab world has done little to help thier Palestinian brethern except use them primarily as a wedge against the West.
So Michael, keep stating you opinions and braving the status quo, you have a very unique platform to do so and I encourage your readers to have the same open mind they expect from others. To the members of the Iranian Football team - sorry guys, you're best match is most likely with your leaders not with another World Cup team.
Posted by: dvdinorl at May 1, 2006 12:49 PM
The comment by Luke gives evidence of how the world community is buying Arab lies at its own grave peril.
Michael asked for names of 19th-century Palestinian Arab figures. He asked for figures including people from the arts and also from the field of soap sales.
But Luke accuses him of arrogance for saying that Palestinian Arabs did not produce the finest artists.
Michael said no such thing. And Luke hits-and-runs away from the point with his accusation.
The point, to be clear, is this: the Arab world invented the Palestinian Arab identity out of a vacuum for use as a weapon in its war to establish a global caliphate, imposing Sharia law universally.
If Luke wanted to counter what Michael had said, he should have actually named Palestinian Arab writers, artists, statesmen and soap salesman from the 19th Century. But he can't, because, it seems, there were none. There was, as far as my research reveals, no Palestinian Arab national identity in the 19th century. I am completely open to proof to the contrary; where is it?
As for Luke's claim that "Palestinians are human too and get royally screwed no doubt," he should not be framing that statement in a context appearing to blame Israelis for the "screwing" of Palestinian Arabs.
Not only do other Arab countries intentionally keep the so-called Palestinians poor because poor they are more useful as a political tool then they would be if they were prosperous, the Palestinian leaders themselves intentionally keep their people poor for that same reason.
Arafat had literally billions squirreled away, keeping his wife in high style in Paris but not improving the lot of the people he allegedly cared so much about. After his death, the billions went lost, but are probably in the hands of his widow and/or most inner circle.
Meanwhile, Israel would like open and friendly relations with all its neighbors but if they left their borders completely open to Palestinian Arabs they would face endless and daily terror attacks. Yet the Arabs manipulate world opinion, trying to paint the picture as though Israel were responsible for the economic conditions of the so-called Palestinians.
People who haven't understood the situation yet should ask themselves this: What would Israel possibly stand to gain by not allowing the Palestinians to prosper? By contrast, by keeping the Palestinians poor, the Arab countries have an anti-Israel tool, and the closer they come to wiping out Israel, the closer they are to their larger goal of establishing a global caliphate.
Don't forget that when Israel withdrew from Gaza and money was needed by the Gazan Arabs to keep running the greenhouses the Israelis had built in Gaza, it was American Jews, not Arabs, who gave the Gazans the money they needed. Those American Jews gave that money in the hopes that a prosperous people would decide to live at peace with its neighbors.
Luke, furthermore, quite idiotically repeats the argument made by Iran today; that the Nazis with their Holocaust caused the current Mid-East conflict. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Luke talks about "objectivity," but objectivity requires at minimum a solid grounding in known historical circumstances and an unswerving willingness to revise one's opinion in light of new information presented. Jews have been present in the Middle East since ancient times and the drive to re-establish Israel gained great momentum in the 19th century; given that, how did the Nazis create the current Mid-East conflict? And even if they had, how would the Arabs be justified in calling for the destruction of Israel?
A most important point to make is that the Mid-East conflict is not one of Palestinians against Israelis; it is Arabs against Israel. And their goal of eliminating Israel is one step towards their larger goal of establishing Islamic supremacy world wide. This is not something asserted out of the clear blue; the Islamists themselves state these as their goals, and the 9/11 attacks should be all the more evidence anybody needs to take them seriously.
Posted by: Scott Rose at May 1, 2006 01:21 PM
One more word to Luke.
Were you on drugs when you made your above comment?
If so, the substance you took is obviously extremely dangerous; it seems to compromise the drug abuser's intellect.
I mean, really, just what were you smoking, snorting, and/or shooting that you think that the Russian Michael Lucas doesn't remember circumstances surrounding the Olympics when they were held in his country?
The very organization of your material looks like the product of a severely drug-addled mind, with my apologies to all the people who use drugs without losing their capacity to make sense. The structure of your first sentence is a disaster. People have been kept back a year after ninth grade for lesser offenses against the English language. Then you say that you will only address the Iranian question, but go on to talk about the Spanish and Florida. What is the connection between Iran, the Spanish and Florida? Ponce de Leon eating caviar while traveling on a flying carpet?
Posted by: Scott Rose at May 1, 2006 07:25 PM
Hello
Just wanted to ask
did you go to college in Russia or America? If so did you graduate and what was your field of study?
Posted by: Kyler at May 1, 2006 08:00 PM
I am completely against your point of view. It is the same case than Irak, of course Iran´s leader comments and acts are disgusting, but the way to change that is not excluding them from the rest of the world, it is just the opposite we should open them our doors in order to show them our values and destroy the propaganda of the iran´s regime, insolating that country will increase the manipulation of the population and in the end we wont avoid the military intervention with the horrible consequences that we have seen in Irak, and Afghanistan, also we must take care with the western media that is clearly in favor of an armed intervention in Iran, and manipulates as much as iran´s media. You must remeber that most of the middle east is already invaded by western forces, and this is also increasing terrorist activities as the only way to defend themselves.
Posted by: Treviso at May 9, 2006 02:56 PM
regarding the Palestinians/Iranian issue: it would be worth while to remember that gays are still being excuted in those countries as well as all/most Arab-Muslim countries; Gentlemen - this is OUR community!
Re: Israel - they actually have an open door policy towards Gay-Palestinians who manage to escape from their families before they are killed; Gay-Palestinians are the ONLY Palestinians who at the moment are allowed to stay in Israel, legaly & under protection of the Israeli goverment.
Think about who is right and who is wrong, who is just - and who is not; I can't believe anyone with their right minds can support Muslim countries; sorry - but we have to acknowladge a big big problem in our free world...
Posted by: Adrian Sanderson at July 11, 2006 12:42 PM
